Comments for The Cutest Human-Test: KittenAuth

161 to 170 of 223 < 1 2 3 ... 16 17 18 ... 21 22 23 >
#161 /* 7 months, 8 days ago */
Cheap pharmaceuticals. Pharmacology.gov.co.uk
#162 /* 7 months, 8 days ago */
Hmm, Interesting concept indeed!!!
#163 /* 7 months, 8 days ago */
Computers have been trained to detect attractive women, im pretty sure it will work for kittens too. http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/04/080404122139.htm
#164 /* 7 months, 8 days ago */
if you're using a finite set of images, the bot could hash the image file and keep track of which are kittens from the 1/84 successful attempts. A little bit of random modification of the images on each use could solve this. Figure each image gets a random hue adjustment/cropping/warping before being sent out. You get to reuse images, but a simple bot shouldn't be able to recognize two images as identical.
#165 /* 7 months, 8 days ago */
Cool idea, heaps better than text, that is clearly broken. In terms of brute force, give people one chance. No reason why you couldn't make it bigger, with smaller images, I don't think it makes it that much harder.
#166 /* 7 months, 8 days ago */
In effect, this is a 3 letter password, using an alphabet consisting of perhaps several hundred letters. While a PC might have a hard time identifying an image as say, kitten vs puppy, consider that the spammer can identify these pictures themself much faster than you can make these pictures. (Then again, maybe with panning zooming video cameras and using every frame of high fps video as a picture...)

While the filename might be random, unless (and probably even it) you use literally gigs of pictures spammers can just store them, organized by an index calculated from the 1st 2-300 bytes. This would give fast recall for matching and with software designed for image comparison, if a newly introduced frame was similar enough to a previous, perhaps cause a match without the exact picture already stored. With proper techniques (condensing pictures, averaging every 4 pixels into a single pixel to make a 1/4 size image, or greatly magnifying this the people breaking the system could really cut down on their space requirements. You don't want to cut down on file size in that the larger the size the more time consuming it is to match images.

Kitten discovery could also be made easier by above-mentioned image matching software, grouping pictures for similarity, perhaps 100 to a page with a human 1st choosing "overall kitten" or "overall not a kitten" and then clicking exceptions.

On the other hand... this could lead to the creation of powerful image recognition software, which were the spammers to offer, might make for a legitimate product for them. So, what else would be good challenge, currently seen as "impossible" that a little greed-driven R&D might help out?
#167 /* 7 months, 8 days ago */
won't work.
all you do is teach the computer which images are cute and which aren't
this could be done by brute force to get them all right,
or you could just have a human pick out the 100 cute cats initially...
then it just has to "read" the images.
keep trying!
#168 /* 7 months, 8 days ago */
This is a brilliant idea!
#169 /* 7 months, 8 days ago */
Coolies :)
#170 /* 7 months, 8 days ago */
Interesting idea. Given that this was just linked to from a front-page Slashdot story, maybe the images of flaming and non-flaming servers is more appropriate?
161 to 170 of 223 < 1 2 3 ... 16 17 18 ... 21 22 23 >
Home | Advertise | About | Contact | Legal © Oli Warner 2001—2007 Proud 9rules member